Understanding Youth Mentoring Relationships: Advancing the Field with Direct Observational Methods

Julia Pryce; Kelsey L. Deane; Johanna E. Barry; Thomas E. Keller

doi:10.1007/S40894-019-00131-Z

Understanding Youth Mentoring Relationships: Advancing the Field with Direct Observational Methods

Julia Pryce
, Kelsey L. Deane
, Johanna E. Barry
, Thomas E. Keller

School of Social Work

University of Auckland
Loyola University Chicago
Portland State University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Journal	Adolescent Research Review
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/S40894-019-00131-Z
State	Published - Jan 1 2020

Disciplines

Educational Psychology
Psychology

Access to Document

10.1007/S40894-019-00131-ZLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{ab2891df6db54e92bf96eb1b42c17dfd,

title = "Understanding Youth Mentoring Relationships: Advancing the Field with Direct Observational Methods",

author = "Julia Pryce and Deane, \{Kelsey L.\} and Barry, \{Johanna E.\} and Keller, \{Thomas E.\}",

note = "There are critical gaps in the youth mentoring knowledge base arising from methodological limitations, including an over-reliance on self-report measures, as well as an overall lack of precision. Direct observational methods allow for more precise comparison across mentoring dyads because, in contrast to respondents applying their own idiographic meanings and interpretations, consistent procedures for obtaining data are possible.",

year = "2020",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/S40894-019-00131-Z",

language = "American English",

journal = "Adolescent Research Review",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Understanding Youth Mentoring Relationships: Advancing the Field with Direct Observational Methods

AU - Pryce, Julia

AU - Deane, Kelsey L.

AU - Barry, Johanna E.

AU - Keller, Thomas E.

N1 - There are critical gaps in the youth mentoring knowledge base arising from methodological limitations, including an over-reliance on self-report measures, as well as an overall lack of precision. Direct observational methods allow for more precise comparison across mentoring dyads because, in contrast to respondents applying their own idiographic meanings and interpretations, consistent procedures for obtaining data are possible.

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40894-019-00131-z

U2 - 10.1007/S40894-019-00131-Z

DO - 10.1007/S40894-019-00131-Z

M3 - Article

JO - Adolescent Research Review

JF - Adolescent Research Review

ER -

Understanding Youth Mentoring Relationships: Advancing the Field with Direct Observational Methods

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this