Toward a New Separation of Church and State: Implications for Analogies to the Supreme Court Decision in Hobby Lobby by the Decision in Obergefell v. Hodges

Vincent J. Samar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In June 2015, in Obergefell v. Hodges , the Supreme Court of the United States determined that there is a fundamental right to marriage that extends to same-sex couples. This Article analyzes the Obergefell decision in light of the Court’s 2014 decision in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby regarding religious protections that might by analogy be afforded under state Religious Freedom Restoration Acts. In particular, the article considers whether a government official may claim the right to religious freedom to deny issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. Additionally, the article suggests that a new standard for the separation of church and state may be required. Although the 2015 decision prevents the government from denying marriage to same-sex couples, the decision does not directly affect private businesses that choose not to provide services for same-sex weddings. It may, however, have an important indirect effect if laws are already present that prohibit sexual orientation discrimination. Therefore, the article explores possible avenues for protection from private discrimination and considers the questions that remain in the wake of the Obergefell decision.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalBoston College Journal of Law & Social Justice
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Disciplines

  • Civil Rights and Discrimination
  • Constitutional Law
  • Family Law
  • Religion Law
  • Sexuality and the Law

Cite this