The Supersymmetric WKB Formalism is Not Exact for All Additive Shape Invariant Potentials.

Jonathan Bougie; Asim Gangopadhyaya; Constantin Rasinariu

The Supersymmetric WKB Formalism is Not Exact for All Additive Shape Invariant Potentials.

Jonathan Bougie, Asim Gangopadhyaya, Constantin Rasinariu

Department of Physics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Journal	arXiv: Quantum Physics
State	Published - Jun 10 2019

Disciplines

Applied Mathematics
Quantum Physics
Mathematics

Cite this

@article{3ab39c3e97344d468356df39b634c73a,

title = "The Supersymmetric WKB Formalism is Not Exact for All Additive Shape Invariant Potentials.",

author = "Jonathan Bougie and Asim Gangopadhyaya and Constantin Rasinariu",

note = "Following the verification of the conjecture made by Comtet, Bandrauk and Campbell that the supersymmetry-inspired semiclassical method known as SWKB is exact for the conventional additive shape invariant potentials, it was widely believed that SWKB yields exact results for all additive shape invariant potentials.",

year = "2019",

month = jun,

day = "10",

language = "American English",

journal = "arXiv: Quantum Physics",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Supersymmetric WKB Formalism is Not Exact for All Additive Shape Invariant Potentials.

AU - Bougie, Jonathan

AU - Gangopadhyaya, Asim

AU - Rasinariu, Constantin

N1 - Following the verification of the conjecture made by Comtet, Bandrauk and Campbell that the supersymmetry-inspired semiclassical method known as SWKB is exact for the conventional additive shape invariant potentials, it was widely believed that SWKB yields exact results for all additive shape invariant potentials.

PY - 2019/6/10

Y1 - 2019/6/10

UR - http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.00068

M3 - Article

JO - arXiv: Quantum Physics

JF - arXiv: Quantum Physics

ER -

The Supersymmetric WKB Formalism is Not Exact for All Additive Shape Invariant Potentials.

Disciplines

Other files and links

Cite this