The courts' views on ghostwriting ethics are wildly divergent. It's time to find uniformity and enhance access to juustice

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

@article{96b1f5125e7248f6b41be15869df1415,

title = "The courts' views on ghostwriting ethics are wildly divergent. It's time to find uniformity and enhance access to juustice",

author = "Jona Goldschmidt",

year = "2018",

month = sep,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "102",

pages = "36--48",

journal = "Judicature",

issn = "0022-5800",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The courts' views on ghostwriting ethics are wildly divergent. It's time to find uniformity and enhance access to juustice

AU - Goldschmidt, Jona

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061487865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061487865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85061487865

SN - 0022-5800

VL - 102

SP - 36

EP - 48

JO - Judicature

JF - Judicature

IS - 3

ER -