Subsidiarity: challenging the top down bias

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Global poverty has received significant attention in the past decade, particularly after the adoption of the United Nation’s Millennium Development Goals in 2002. Commentators and ethicists like Peter Singer have long held that the wealthy of the world have an obligation to help the poor. While the sentiments may be positive, there are real harms that have come from this kind of top down thinking. Subsidiarity, to the contrary, is a much more realistic and morally tenable approach to global poverty.
Original languageAmerican English
JournalJournal of Religion and Business Ethics
Volume1
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • subsidiarity
  • global poverty
  • poverty alleviation

Disciplines

  • Business Administration, Management, and Operations
  • Ethics in Religion
  • Growth and Development
  • Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion

Cite this