Manual vs. automated CTA: Psychosocial Adaptation in Young Adolescents with Spina Bifida

Fred B. Bryant; Rachael Millstein Coakley; Grayson Holmbeck; Paul R. Yarnold

Manual vs. automated CTA: Psychosocial Adaptation in Young Adolescents with Spina Bifida

Fred B. Bryant
, Rachael Millstein Coakley
, Grayson Holmbeck
, Paul R. Yarnold

Department of Psychology

Harvard Medical School
Optimal Data Analysis, LLC

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Compared to the manually-derived model, the enumerated CTA model was 20% more parsimonious, 3.6% more accurate and 30% more efficient, and was more consistent with a priori hypotheses.

Original language	American English
Journal	Psychology: Faculty Publications and Other Works
Volume	1
State	Published - Sep 17 2010

Disciplines

Psychology

Access to Document

Manual vsFinal published version, 276 KBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{c83150017679498f87894cfb0cf12f3d,

title = "Manual vs. automated CTA: Psychosocial Adaptation in Young Adolescents with Spina Bifida",

abstract = " Compared to the manually-derived model, the enumerated CTA model was 20\% more parsimonious, 3.6\% more accurate and 30\% more efficient, and was more consistent with a priori hypotheses.",

author = "Bryant, \{Fred B.\} and \{Millstein Coakley\}, Rachael and Grayson Holmbeck and Yarnold, \{Paul R.\}",

year = "2010",

month = sep,

day = "17",

language = "American English",

volume = "1",

journal = "Psychology: Faculty Publications and Other Works",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Manual vs. automated CTA: Psychosocial Adaptation in Young Adolescents with Spina Bifida

AU - Bryant, Fred B.

AU - Millstein Coakley, Rachael

AU - Holmbeck, Grayson

AU - Yarnold, Paul R.

PY - 2010/9/17

Y1 - 2010/9/17

N2 - Compared to the manually-derived model, the enumerated CTA model was 20% more parsimonious, 3.6% more accurate and 30% more efficient, and was more consistent with a priori hypotheses.

AB - Compared to the manually-derived model, the enumerated CTA model was 20% more parsimonious, 3.6% more accurate and 30% more efficient, and was more consistent with a priori hypotheses.

UR - https://ecommons.luc.edu/psychology_facpubs/62

M3 - Article

VL - 1

JO - Psychology: Faculty Publications and Other Works

JF - Psychology: Faculty Publications and Other Works

ER -

Manual vs. automated CTA: Psychosocial Adaptation in Young Adolescents with Spina Bifida

Abstract

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this