Manual vs. automated CTA: Psychosocial Adaptation in Young Adolescents with Spina Bifida

Fred B. Bryant, Rachael Millstein Coakley, Grayson Holmbeck, Paul R. Yarnold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Compared to the manually-derived model, the enumerated CTA model was 20% more parsimonious, 3.6% more accurate and 30% more efficient, and was more consistent with a priori hypotheses.

Original languageAmerican English
JournalPsychology: Faculty Publications and Other Works
Volume1
StatePublished - Sep 17 2010

Disciplines

  • Psychology

Cite this