Lying and Ethics

Thomas L. Carson

doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.36

Lying and Ethics

Loyola University Chicago

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Journal	Default journal
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.36
State	Published - Nov 15 2018

Disciplines

Philosophy
Ethics and Political Philosophy

Access to Document

10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.36License: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{5bfbb16102e049298a3e84a6ece1deb8,

title = "Lying and Ethics",

author = "Carson, {Thomas L.}",

note = "The author presents the arguments of Augustine and Kant for thinking that lying is always wrong no matter what. Act-utilitarianism holds that lying is morally right whenever the consequences of lying are better than (or as good as) those of not lying. Ross rejects absolutism, but says that utilitarianism is too permissive about lying.",

year = "2018",

month = nov,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.36",

language = "American English",

journal = "Default journal",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lying and Ethics

AU - Carson, Thomas L.

N1 - The author presents the arguments of Augustine and Kant for thinking that lying is always wrong no matter what. Act-utilitarianism holds that lying is morally right whenever the consequences of lying are better than (or as good as) those of not lying. Ross rejects absolutism, but says that utilitarianism is too permissive about lying.

PY - 2018/11/15

Y1 - 2018/11/15

UR - https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780198736578-e-36

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.36

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198736578.013.36

M3 - Article

JO - Default journal

JF - Default journal

ER -

Lying and Ethics

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this