Judging the “Vapid and Hollow Charade”: Citizen Evaluations and the Candor of U.S. Supreme Court Nominees

Philip G. Chen; Amanda C. Bryan

doi:10.1007/s11109-017-9411-y

Judging the “Vapid and Hollow Charade”: Citizen Evaluations and the Candor of U.S. Supreme Court Nominees

Philip G. Chen
, Amanda C. Bryan

Department of Political Science

University of Calgary

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Journal	Political Behavior
Volume	40
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-017-9411-y
State	Published - Jun 1 2018

Disciplines

Law
Public Administration
Sociology

Access to Document

10.1007/s11109-017-9411-yLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{55b45212f3b540178fd7176a9e84c764,

title = "Judging the “Vapid and Hollow Charade”: Citizen Evaluations and the Candor of U.S. Supreme Court Nominees",

author = "Chen, \{Philip G.\} and Bryan, \{Amanda C.\}",

note = "Supreme Court confirmation hearings have been famously called a {"}vapid and hollow charade{"} by Elena Kagan. Indeed, perceptions of nominees' refusal to answer questions about pending cases, prominent...",

year = "2018",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1007/s11109-017-9411-y",

language = "American English",

volume = "40",

journal = "Political Behavior",

issn = "1573-6687",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Judging the “Vapid and Hollow Charade”: Citizen Evaluations and the Candor of U.S. Supreme Court Nominees

AU - Chen, Philip G.

AU - Bryan, Amanda C.

N1 - Supreme Court confirmation hearings have been famously called a "vapid and hollow charade" by Elena Kagan. Indeed, perceptions of nominees' refusal to answer questions about pending cases, prominent...

PY - 2018/6/1

Y1 - 2018/6/1

UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11109-017-9411-y

U2 - 10.1007/s11109-017-9411-y

DO - 10.1007/s11109-017-9411-y

M3 - Article

SN - 1573-6687

VL - 40

JO - Political Behavior

JF - Political Behavior

IS - 2

ER -

Judging the “Vapid and Hollow Charade”: Citizen Evaluations and the Candor of U.S. Supreme Court Nominees

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this