Evidence-based Assessment in Pediatric Psychology: Family Measures

Melissa A. Alderfer, Barbara H. Fiese, Jeffrey I. Gold, J. J. Cutuli, Grayson N. Holmbeck, Lutz Goldbeck, Christine T. Chambers, Mona Abad, Dante Spetter, Joan Patterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective To provide a review of the evidence base of family measures relevant to pediatric psychology. Method Twenty-nine family measures were selected based upon endorsement by Division 54 listserv members, expert judgment, and literature review. Spanning observational and self-report methods, the measures fell into three broad assessment categories: Family functioning, Dyadic family relationships, and Family functioning in the context of childhood chronic health conditions. Measures were categorized as: “Well-established”, “Approaching well-established”, or “Promising.” Results Nineteen measures met “well-established” criteria and the remaining ten were “approaching well-established.” “Well-established” measures were documented for each of the broad assessment categories named above. Conclusions Many measures deemed “well-established” in the general population are proving to be reliable and useful in pediatric samples. More evidence of the validity of family measures is needed in this context. This review should prove helpful to clinicians and researchers as they strive to make evidence-based decisions regarding family measures.
Original languageAmerican English
JournalJournal of Pediatric Psychology
Volume33
Issue number9
StatePublished - 2008

Keywords

  • assessment
  • evidence-based
  • family measurement
  • pediatric psychology

Disciplines

  • Medicine and Health Sciences
  • Social and Behavioral Sciences

Cite this