Evaluation of TEAM Rubric: Report to Tennessee Consortium on Research, Evaluation and Development Vanderbilt University

Catherine A McClellan; John R Donoghue

Evaluation of TEAM Rubric: Report to Tennessee Consortium on Research, Evaluation and Development Vanderbilt University

Catherine A McClellan, John R Donoghue

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

 This paper examines investigation of the TEAM instrument, including analyses of the 2011-2012
 data. This report summarizes three sets of activities. The first is a set of analyses evaluating the
 differences, if any, between scores from announced and unannounced teacher observations. The
 second set of tasks is geared at recommending the possible simplification of the TEAM rubrics
 through analyses and expert judgment. [Abstract taken from Executive Summary]

Original language	American English
Journal	Default journal
State	Published - Oct 2013

Keywords

Teacher observations
Teaching practice
System evaluation
Evaluation
TEAM Rubric

Disciplines

Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research

Cite this

@article{633f7e1e606a4b75b0c7d4dfb4b680c1,

title = "Evaluation of TEAM Rubric: Report to Tennessee Consortium on Research, Evaluation and Development Vanderbilt University",

abstract = " This paper examines investigation of the TEAM instrument, including analyses of the 2011-2012 data. This report summarizes three sets of activities. The first is a set of analyses evaluating the differences, if any, between scores from announced and unannounced teacher observations. The second set of tasks is geared at recommending the possible simplification of the TEAM rubrics through analyses and expert judgment. [Abstract taken from Executive Summary]",

keywords = "Teacher observations, Teaching practice, System evaluation, Evaluation, TEAM Rubric",

author = "McClellan, {Catherine A} and Donoghue, {John R}",

year = "2013",

month = oct,

language = "American English",

journal = "Default journal",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of TEAM Rubric: Report to Tennessee Consortium on Research, Evaluation and Development Vanderbilt University

AU - McClellan, Catherine A

AU - Donoghue, John R

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - This paper examines investigation of the TEAM instrument, including analyses of the 2011-2012 data. This report summarizes three sets of activities. The first is a set of analyses evaluating the differences, if any, between scores from announced and unannounced teacher observations. The second set of tasks is geared at recommending the possible simplification of the TEAM rubrics through analyses and expert judgment. [Abstract taken from Executive Summary]

AB - This paper examines investigation of the TEAM instrument, including analyses of the 2011-2012 data. This report summarizes three sets of activities. The first is a set of analyses evaluating the differences, if any, between scores from announced and unannounced teacher observations. The second set of tasks is geared at recommending the possible simplification of the TEAM rubrics through analyses and expert judgment. [Abstract taken from Executive Summary]

KW - Teacher observations

KW - Teaching practice

KW - System evaluation

KW - Evaluation

KW - TEAM Rubric

UR - http://www.clowderconsulting.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/TN-Final-Report_09_03_2013-draft10_16_13v2.pdf

M3 - Article

JO - Default journal

JF - Default journal

ER -

Evaluation of TEAM Rubric: Report to Tennessee Consortium on Research, Evaluation and Development Vanderbilt University

Abstract

Keywords

Disciplines

Other files and links

Cite this