Abstract
Abstract: This paper rebuts the thesis that political Islam conflicts with secular democracy. More precisely, it examines three sorts of claims that ostensibly support this thesis:(a) The Muslim religion is incompatible with secular democracy;(b) No Muslim country has instituted secular democracy; and(c) No movement seeking to advance its agenda as aggressively as political Islam does can do so with the degree of moderation required of a political party that is committed to secular democracy.Theologians, philosophers, and political scientists have debated (a) through (c) within the jurisdiction of their respective fields. I propose to combine these debates in developing what I hope will be a novel interdisciplinary examination of the relevant issues. The paper compares different types of Muslim regimes, different models of secular democracy, and different conceptions of public reason, and concludes with a comparison between Catholicism and Islam regarding the relevant question.
Original language | American English |
---|---|
Journal | Philosophy: Faculty Publications and Other Works |
State | Published - Jan 1 2014 |
Keywords
- secularism
- democracy
- Islam
- Catholicism
- Indonesia
Disciplines
- Civil Rights and Discrimination
- Comparative and Foreign Law
- Comparative Methodologies and Theories
- Constitutional Law
- Ethics and Political Philosophy
- First Amendment
- Fourteenth Amendment
- Human Rights Law
- International Law
- Jurisprudence
- Law
- Law and Politics
- Philosophy
- Political Science
- Religion
- Religion Law
- Social and Behavioral Sciences